One doesn’t hear praise for Mr. de la Maza’s book these days. But I’m glad to learn you found it useful. As a low-rated beginner, I think his approach might be what I need.
The book has been met with a lit of criticism. I picked it up when I was in my mid 20s when the world was not nearly as connected as it is now. What I can say is it helped me a lot. I attribute a lot of my tactical growth from it. Cycling a lot of puzzles on some repetition is good for building common pattern recognition. Thanks for reading my post.
One doesn’t hear praise for Mr. de la Maza’s book these days. But I’m glad to learn you found it useful. As a low-rated beginner, I think his approach might be what I need.
The book has been met with a lit of criticism. I picked it up when I was in my mid 20s when the world was not nearly as connected as it is now. What I can say is it helped me a lot. I attribute a lot of my tactical growth from it. Cycling a lot of puzzles on some repetition is good for building common pattern recognition. Thanks for reading my post.